On migrants and marriage

Have very belatedly added Left Foot Forward to my blogroll. It’s a very smart site by Will Straw and Shamik Das (met them both at Conference, scared ’em silly) and I’ve only just got around to looking at it properly; there are a couple of pieces on there today which caught my eye, and both of them reminded me of people I’ve spoken to recently.

First of all, there’s this coverage of last year’s migration statistics, showing that migration from A8 states (Poland, Czech Republic, Hungary, Slovakia, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Slovenia) was down to just 9000 last year, from 78000 in 2007; also that emigration by A8 nationals more than doubled, from 25,000 to 69,000.

Not only is this as a slap of wet fish around the face to the right-wing press, UKIP, the BNP and similar organisations, but it backs up a trend I’d noticed among people I work with in Salford. I see A8 nationals every day – not only our clients, but also students and others who  contribute such a lot to the UK by volunteering with our service – and, as the stats show, the overwhelming majority are working…or trying to. One Polish client asked me plaintively “Why is it so difficult to get a job?” Although one answer in that case might be “Do you read the papers?”, it does explain the number of clients I see who are heading back to Eastern Europe. If you can’t get a job here either – and can’t claim benefits unless you’ve been working for long enough, incidentally – you can see why some people might prefer to go where everyone knows how to pronounce their name.

The other post full of win on today’s yesterday’s Left Foot assesses the Conservatives’ policy of tax incentives and its impact if implemented: namely, that the richest 10% of families would come out 13 times better off than the poorest 10% – another ‘rob the poor to pay the rich’  Tory idea, to add to the list under inheritance tax and scrapping the 50p tax rate.

Of course, these families would only get something like an extra £20 a week. So why bother? Well, says the policy report on which this policy is based (from Iain Duncan Smith’s Social Justice Policy Group, inevitably…why is IDS so obsessed with ‘family breakdown’? Does he have daddy issues?), ‘It would make it easier for a mother or father to remain at home to look after their children whilst the other spouse worked, or for one partner to do voluntary work within the community, look after elderly or disabled members or manage a home in a way that enables partners and families to have more undivided time together.’ In other words, tax incentives would be a tiny little cherry on the massive, rich cake that is just how much easier it already is to be a two-parent family than a single parent.

I got a call just as I was getting to work this morning. It wasn’t from a client, it was from someone I know personally, very stressed because she’s mired in solicitors over her divorce and contact issues for her young daughter.

This woman got married, back in 2003, like the Tories think we all should, and she had a little girl. And for a few months they played happy families; and then, for several years, her husband beat the shit out of her. He tried to strangle her in front of their then two-year-old daughter. He hit her older kids. He interrupted her teenage daughter’s birthday party by smashing up the house. And then, to the relief of everyone except my friend, who was in love with her husband, he left. He moved several hundred miles away; he ignored my friend’s pleas for him to maintain a relationship with his daughter; he paid no maintenance until the CSA tracked him down.

My friend was left to go through the grief of being abandoned; the humiliation of realising how long she’d spent with a man who would never have been worth a tenth of her; the absolute heartbreak of watching her little girl come to terms with the fact that her father wanted nothing to do with her. She is still living with the loneliness of single parenthood; with the relative poverty of a single income; with the logistical nightmare of finding friends and family willing to do school runs to allow her to work at all. And now she’s dealing – still largely on her own – with the stress of court proceedings as her daughter’s father reappears on the scene to reclaim the little girl who has just about manged to forget how badly he hurt her. It’s not easy. It’s not all easy to legislate for. Tax credits have helped enormously. Free childcare places and Domestic Violence Protection Orders – both announced as forthcoming by the Labour government – will come too late for my friend, but will help thousands like her.

But what if this had happened under a Tory government? What would they have done for her? I’ll tell you what: they would have rubbed her nose in her own misery. If my friend’s horrible, dysfunctional, worst-possible-environment-to-raise-a-child marriage had ‘broken down’ under the Tories, when her husband left he would have taken with him not only his income and his fists, but a precious twenty quid a week. As well as envying married couples their companionship, their choices over who gets to stay home and who gets to go out to work and their quality time with their kids, my friend would have been reminded that the government thought she was a failure for not being just like them.

There is nothing broken about my friend’s family. Her little girl is the brightest, most well-looked-after child I have ever met, and recognisably better off than she was with her destructive father present. It’s the kind of family the Conservatives will never reward, because it’s the kind they will never understand.

more than doubled from 25,000 to 69,000

4 thoughts on “On migrants and marriage

  1. Excellent blog Grace. I have one very minor point, you describe a very ideal situation for married couples, which may be true for a lucky, well-off few. Most marrieds that I know do not get to choose who stays home with the children and spend quality time. For most of us, it’s a necessity for both to go out to work and then deal with the associated guilt of not spending enough quality time with the children.

    This does not detract from a quality piece of writing though!

  2. Your assertion over the Conservatives reaction to this woman’s plight is bollocks.
    I can give you many stories similar to the one above, but where in fact, the so called mother was the trigger for domestic violence.
    There are two sides to every story Madam.
    Don’t make sweeping statements that have no basis in facts.
    Child poverty has increased under Labour. FACT!
    The number of children leaving school without the ability to read & write has risen under Labour. FACT
    Child crime has risen under Labour. FACT
    After 13 years in power, your Gov., is leaving a legacy of a broken society.
    That’s nothing compared to the disaster of your Foreign policy.
    Blair…The war monger. How many innocent children have died as a result of his & your Gov., policies?
    Get a grip. Stop sticking your head in the sand & face reality.

    1. I’ve approved this comment just to make it clear why I won’t be approving any of yours in future. In case you’re wondering, the line ‘the so called mother was the trigger for domestic violence’ was the point where I decided you are no longer welcome to contribute to this site.

  3. Good post. I’ve never understood the £20 a week tax credit, and you’ve pretty much nailed the key problems.

    If, as the Tories supposedly believe, it’s better to be a two parent family, why on earth two-parent familys need extra cash? It’s like saying to an ill person “I think it’s bad for your kids that you’re ill, so you’re not eligable for this extra healthcare”. Or, indeed, like saying “I think it’s good that you have money, have some more money as a reward “, which I guess is the basic instinct the Tories still follow.

    Kids can have wonderful childhoods with a single parent, and can have horrible childhoods with two parents. They cannot, however, have tolerable childhoods while living in poverty. We should be desperately focusing any extra money on lifting as many families as possible out of poverty, rather than making simplistic, outdated and frankly stupid judgements about what the best kind of family is.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s